Whoopi Goldberg Loses It on The View After Confronting Elon Musk, Gets Kicked Off Her Own Show

A fiery exchange occurred on “The View” when host Whoopi Goldberg confronted billionaire Elon Musk over his recent controversial statements. Goldberg, known for her directness, challenged Musk’s behavior, saying, “You’ve been saying some wild things lately, Elon, and people are wondering what’s going on.”

Musk, seemingly enjoying the debate, responded, “People need to learn to take a joke. I’m just having some fun, Whoopi.”

Goldberg firmly countered, “It’s not a joke when your platform spreads dangerous misinformation, risking lives.”

As the tension escalated, other hosts attempted to mediate, but Goldberg refused to yield. In frustration, she exclaimed, “I won’t sit here and listen to this nonsense!” and left the set.

Viewers took to social media, divided in their reactions. Some criticized Goldberg for her conduct, deeming it unprofessional, while others praised her for holding Musk accountable.

This incident sparked a national debate about the role of public figures, their responsibility, and the importance of confronting misinformation. Goldberg’s actions served as a reminder of the need to challenge influential individuals and protect the truth.


Massive Win For Fox News Star Greg Gutfeld As He Surpasses Woke Stephen Colbert For The First Time, Crushing Cable Late Night

Greg Gutfeld, the rising conservative news host, is now leading in the coveted A25-54 demographic, surpassing late-night TV competition with ‘Gutfeld!’ delivering its best-ever ratings. Gutfeld outperformed Stephen Colbert in the A25-54 group and beat liberal rivals, including Jimmy Kimmel, Colbert, and Jimmy Fallon, in total viewership. Airing at 11 PM/ET, ‘Gutfeld!’ also outshone CNN and MSNBC in both total viewers and the A25-54 category.

Furthermore, Gutfeld is a key host on The Five, which has been the top-rated show for eight consecutive months, consistently dominating cable news. Fox News has enjoyed four months of superiority over competitors, including CNN and MSNBC. These numbers reflect a strong demand for patriotism and Christian values, indicating growing discontent with the liberal narrative in America.


Goldie Hawn & Kurt Russell Celebrate Giant Milestone She Says Would Have Never Happened If They Married

Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell’s love story began in 1966 during the filming of “The One and Only, Genuine, Original Family Band.” Despite their attraction, they didn’t pursue it due to an age gap. They both married and had children before reuniting in 1983 during “Swing Shift.”

Their first date, at the Playboy Club, led them to Hawn’s new house, where they had to break in after forgetting the key. This incident marked the start of their deep connection.

Hawn and Russell stress their profound “liking” for each other, which they consider more crucial than love. They’ve never married and have no plans to do so. Hawn admitted that, had they married, they might have divorced long ago.

For them, the key to their enduring relationship is knowing when to rely on each other while maintaining independence. Over almost forty years, they’ve built a remarkable partnership, proving that love and liking can create a lasting bond.


20 Pictures of People Having Their BEST Day Ever

We often hear people having a bad day struggling in their daily lives. Sometimes, being surrounded by these “blue days”, ours turn out the same. However, some lucky people are having the best moments that make their days!

Viral Strange has collected 20 pictures of people having their best day ever! Just to get that positivity dose for today… Enjoy!

1. When you find your long-lost dog after years.

2. When you drop the keys and they ALMOST fall into the drain.

3. When you find a 75-pound bag full of cash and get rewarded $5,000 for returning it.

4. When you find three pop tarts in the packaging of one.

5. Now THIS is a good day.

6. It’s small things like this…

7. A day to celebrate!

8. The luck!

9. Really lucky!

10. Finding a 3.69-carat diamond in a park.

11. Getting a high five from a member of your favorite football team.

12. Having multiple bags of chips for the payment of one.

13. Not being lunch for the shark! LOL.

14. Being the only guy surrounded by pretty ladies in a hot tub!

15. Having the time of your life at Chuck E. Cheese.

16. Oh my, what a stroke of luck!

17. Dropping your phone on the toilet and not getting it wet!

18. Finding $1M value Spanish gold

19. Getting an extra beer!

20. Winning the lottery TWICE in ONE DAY!

Which one did you like most? Do you have any pictures of your best day ever? Tell us in the comments!


14 Unfortunate Days But Make It Funny

Have you ever happened to be in an unfortunate situation, but the only thing left to do was laugh about it?

Then, you know how this works. People who see the worst events as something positive in the end should be saved at all costs!

Viral Strange has collected 14 pictures of unfortunate days that people have gone through, but their optimism has triumphed! Let’s laugh.

1. Oh, no…

© predatorhistorian/Imgur

2. Maybe she just wanted to surf

© u/Ryan0617/Reddit

3. This is what defeat looks like.

© u/spklovestheusa/Reddit

4. My buddy traveled across the country to visit me last weekend. Unfortunately, he got stuck in his hotel shower for 3 hours.

© wilsononreddit/Reddit

5. When the crash steals your face

© AllParasail/Reddit

6. My fortune cookie had no fortune

© fajitanado/Reddit

7. Delaying the inevitable

© XyloPiano/Reddit

8. We live on a ranch and my kids have a bad habit of leaving the front door open.

© practiced/Reddit

9. They look dry enough

© GallowBoob/Reddit

10. I just wanted a midnight snack…

© MightySuperNoodle/Reddit

11. My Halloween decorations got eaten by a moose this morning.

© spenardagain/Reddit

12. Out in the nature

© GrinGoPsixoPat/Pikabu

13. My cat is grounded indefinitely (Context: Jamie is the cat)

© kCrankasaurusRexx/Reddit

14. I am not a smart man.

© Dsquared77/Reddit

Tell us about your best unfortunate day in the comments below!


DONALD Trump’s Could Live To Be 200 Because He Has ‘Incredibly Good Genes!!!

Former White House physician and current Texas congressman, Rep. Ronny Jackson, praised Donald Trump’s health, emphasizing his excellent cardiac stress test results and cognitive abilities. He stated, “He was in the top 10% of everyone his age.” Jackson even joked that with better eating habits, Trump could live to be 200 due to his “incredibly good genes.”

This evaluation comes in light of President Joe Biden’s recent medical exam, which declared him fit for office. The health of these leaders has become a significant topic, with discussions about mandatory mental competency tests for politicians over 75.

The question of whether a president should undergo cognitive testing is complex, involving ethical and political considerations. Medical assessments can identify potential impairments, but they don’t solely determine a leader’s fitness for office. The ability to give long speeches isn’t the only measure of suitability.


52-Year-Old Model Flaunts Stunning Curves in Swimsuit

A 52-year-old model, Allegra Cole, initially ventured into modeling at the age of 30, looking quite different from her current self. Nonetheless, as she began earning well, she chose to enhance her appearance and perfect her body. Over the years, she became an increasingly prominent figure in the world of modeling, thanks to her striking looks and unique approach to beauty.

52-Year-Old Model

Nevertheless, Allegra’s definition of perfection was quite unusual. At 52, she had undergone numerous plastic surgeries, transforming her body into something seemingly monstrous. Her husband had attempted to persuade her to reconsider, but she remained unyielding in her quest for what she considered her ideal appearance.

allegracoleworld / Instagram

This determination to achieve her vision of beauty came at the cost of her marriage. After over two decades together, her husband could no longer bear her radical transformation and chose to part ways. Surprisingly, Allegra was not particularly distressed by the breakup, seemingly content with her newfound identity and the path she had chosen.

52-Year-Old Model
allegracoleworld / Instagram

Last year, the model opted for further enhancement of her already petite physique, pushing the boundaries of conventional beauty standards. Her current appearance may appear extreme to some, yet Allegra herself considers it the epitome of beauty. Despite her dramatic physical changes, she has managed to amass a substantial followingon social media, where her unique aesthetic and self-confidence have resonated with a considerable audience.

What’s your take on this 52-year-old model and her choices? Do you think her transformation is a bold expression of personal freedom, or do you find it concerning? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments.


Larger Breasts: Why Women Want Them And Media’s Role in It

Larger breasts in women are a complex topic, influenced by natural factors and societal influences, including the media. Viral Strange will list some reasons why women tend to desire bigger breasts.

1. Biological and Evolutionary Factors

Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash
Attractiveness to men: While it is true that men may generally find larger breasts attractive, this is not universal. Human preferences vary widely; not all men are exclusively attracted to bigger boobs. From an evolutionary perspective, some researchers have suggested that larger breasts might signal fertility and health, as they could be seen as an indicator of adequate nutrition.

2. Social and Cultural Factors

Competition among women: The competition among women for desirable partners is influenced by both social and biological factors. Evolutionary psychology suggests that women may compete for mates, but this doesn’t solely revolve around breast size. It also encompasses other traits, such as facial attractiveness, personality, and social status.

Perception of maturity and femininity: The idea that big boobs make a woman appear more mature and feminine is influenced by societal perceptions. They have long been associated with femininity, and this cultural notion shapes how women perceive themselves.

Photo by Kelly
Professional success: Studies have shown that physical appearance can impact a person’s professional success. Attractive individuals may enjoy certain advantages in the workplace, but this should not be oversimplified. Success depends on various factors, including skills, qualifications, and personality.

Fashion industry: The fashion industry has historically favored certain body types, including those with big boobs. This preference can create pressure on women to conform to these standards. However, body positivity movements and shifts in fashion industry standards challenge these norms.

3. Media and Celebrity Culture

Photo by cottonbro studio
Media influence: The media, including advertisements and celebrity culture, play a significant role in perpetuating beauty ideals. Celebrities with larger breasts often become cultural icons, and their images are frequently used to promote various products, creating a perception that they are highly desirable.

Impact on body image: Media portrayals can influence women’s body image and self-esteem, as they are bombarded with images of idealized beauty. The desire for larger breasts, therefore, can be fueled by these unrealistic standards.

Photo by Alexander Krivitskiy
4. Consumerism and Exploitation

Photo by cottonbro studio
Exploitation of insecurities: The cosmetic surgery and beauty industries can capitalize on women’s insecurities, marketing breast augmentation as a solution to conform to societal ideals. The desire for larger breasts is often linked to consumerism and profit motives.

Media and advertising for profit amplify the desire to have them bigger. Individuals should decide about their bodies based on their preferences and needs rather than external pressures or standards.


“No Woke People Allowed Here”: Roseanne Barr Throws Robert Deniro Out Of Her Show

In a recent and unexpected twist within the entertainment industry, Roseanne Barr, a name synonymous with controversy and candidness, has made headlines again. This time, it’s for her decision to remove the legendary actor Robert De Niro from her latest television project. The bold move was underscored with a statement that’s as straightforward as it is provocative: “No woke people allowed here.”
Roseanne Barr has been a household name since the late 1980s, primarily due to her eponymous sitcom “Roseanne,” which broke new ground in terms of portraying working-class America. However, her journey has been anything but smooth, marked by a series of controversies that culminated in the cancellation of the “Roseanne” reboot in 2018 over a racially insensitive tweet.

On the other hand, Robert De Niro, an actor revered for his compelling performances and iconic roles, is also known for his strong political stands and vocal support for various social issues. His inclusion in Barr’s project was initially seen as a unifying force in a polarized climate. However, this collaboration has now taken a dramatic turn.
The seeds of conflict were sown when Barr and De Niro began working together on the new show, anticipated to be a groundbreaking project blending comedy with contemporary societal commentary. However, it soon became clear that their visions for the project were fundamentally at odds.

Tensions escalated over the show’s direction and content, particularly regarding its treatment of current social and political issues. Barr, known for her no-holds-barred approach to comedy and social commentary, aimed to preserve her style of candid and sometimes abrasive humor. De Niro, with his known advocacy for ‘woke’ culture, was reportedly pushing for a more nuanced and sensitive approach.
The situation reached a boiling point during a script read-through, where a disagreement over a particular scene encapsulated the broader ideological clash between the two. Barr, feeling that her creative vision was being compromised, reportedly declared, “No woke people allowed here,” effectively signaling De Niro’s exit from the show.

This decision has sent ripples through the entertainment industry, sparking heated discussions on social media and among industry professionals. Supporters of Barr applaud her for standing her ground and defending her vision against the pressures of political correctness. Critics, however, accuse her of being insensitive and unwilling to adapt to a changing societal landscape.
The incident has also reignited the debate on cancel culture, artistic freedom, and the role of political correctness in entertainment. While some view Barr’s move as a stand against a culture of censorship, others see it as a refusal to acknowledge the importance of responsible storytelling in today’s world.

The controversy has drawn reactions from various industry insiders. Some have expressed support for Barr’s right to creative control, while others have lamented the missed opportunity for a collaboration that could have bridged divides. The situation has also put network executives and producers in a challenging position, as they navigate the complex interplay of creativity, audience expectations, and social responsibility.
The Barr-De Niro standoff is more than just a clash of personalities; it reflects the broader cultural and political divisions in society. It underscores the challenges faced by artists and creators in balancing creative expression with societal sensibilities.

This incident raises critical questions about the nature of comedy and art in the context of contemporary issues. How far can artists go in exploring sensitive subjects without crossing the line? Is there a responsibility to conform to societal norms, or should art be an unfettered expression of the creator’s vision?

The confrontation has highlighted the difficulty in fostering constructive dialogue in an increasingly polarized environment. The clash between Barr and De Niro exemplifies how challenging it is for individuals with differing viewpoints to find common ground, particularly in the realm of entertainment, which often reflects and amplifies societal tensions.

This incident also sheds light on the role of entertainment in reflecting and shaping societal norms. Shows and films do not exist in a vacuum; they are a part of the broader cultural conversation. As such, the decisions made by creators like Barr can have far-reaching implications, influencing public opinion and contributing to the cultural zeitgeist.

The removal of Robert De Niro from Roseanne Barr’s new show marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing conversation about the intersection of art, politics, and society. It reflects the evolving nature of comedy, the responsibility of artists, and the expectations of audiences in a rapidly changing world.

As the industry and its audience continue to grapple with these issues, the Barr-De Niro saga will likely be remembered as a significant, if controversial, chapter in the story of modern entertainment. Whether it leads to greater understanding and dialogue or further entrenches division is a question that remains open, resonating far beyond the confines of a single television show.


“Awful and Ungodly”: Jim Caviezel Takes a Stand, Refusing to Work with Robert De Niro

In a surprising turn of events within the entertainment industry, actor Jim Caviezel has made headlines for refusing to collaborate with the acclaimed Robert De Niro, branding him as an “awful, ungodly man.” The announcement has sent shockwaves through Hollywood, sparking discussions about the intersection of personal convictions and professional collaborations. This article explores the details surrounding Caviezel’s bold decision, the reasons behind his refusal to work with De Niro, and the broader implications of such public declarations within the film industry.

Jim Caviezel, best known for his portrayal of Jesus Christ in Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ,” has built a reputation for his strong Christian beliefs and commitment to roles that align with his moral values. On the other hand, Robert De Niro, an iconic figure in the industry, is known for his diverse roles and outspoken views on various social and political issues. Caviezel’s refusal to work with De Niro has put a spotlight on the clash between personal ethics and the collaborative nature of filmmaking.


Caviezel’s declaration came during a recent interview where he was asked about potential collaborations with De Niro. The actor responded unequivocally, stating, “I won’t work with Robert De Niro. He’s an awful, ungodly man.” The strong language used in the statement immediately caught the attention of the media and fans alike, prompting questions about the nature of the alleged conflict between the two actors.


While Caviezel did not delve into specific details during the interview, it is evident that his decision is rooted in a fundamental clash of values. Given Caviezel’s outspoken Christian faith and dedication to projects that align with his moral compass, it is reasonable to assume that he perceives a misalignment with De Niro’s public persona or past actions. The lack of specificity in Caviezel’s statement has fueled speculation and intensified public interest in understanding the dynamics at play.


The entertainment industry is no stranger to actors taking public stances on various issues, including their refusal to work with certain individuals. However, Caviezel’s bold statement has elicited mixed reactions. Some applaud his commitment to his principles, seeing it as a rare act of authenticity in an industry often criticized for its moral ambiguity. Others question the wisdom of making such public declarations, suggesting that it may limit professional opportunities and perpetuate division within the industry.


Caviezel’s refusal to work with De Niro raises broader questions about how actors navigate their personal beliefs within the collaborative and often politically charged environment of Hollywood. While the industry has historically thrived on diversity of thought and expression, instances of actors drawing lines based on personal values are becoming more frequent. The incident reflects the evolving landscape of Hollywood, where individuals feel compelled to assert their principles, even at the risk of professional consequences.


The entertainment industry has seen instances where actors’ public statements have both enhanced and hindered their careers. Caviezel’s refusal to work with De Niro may garner support from like-minded individuals who appreciate his commitment to his beliefs. However, it also raises questions about the potential impact on his future collaborations and the perception of industry professionals who may view such public declarations with caution.


Jim Caviezel’s deep Christian faith has been a defining aspect of his public persona. His role in “The Passion of the Christ” catapulted him into the spotlight as an actor unafraid to take on roles that resonate with his spiritual convictions. The clash with De Niro underscores the challenges faced by actors who seek to maintain their integrity in an industry known for its complexities and moral ambiguities.


Beyond the individual actors involved, Caviezel’s refusal to work with De Niro prompts reflection on the broader implications for Hollywood and the entertainment industry. The incident highlights the ongoing tension between personal beliefs and the collaborative nature of filmmaking. As actors increasingly use their platforms to express their values, the industry may witness a shift in dynamics, with more individuals choosing to take a stand on issues they hold dear.

Jim Caviezel’s decision to refuse collaboration with Robert De Niro based on moral grounds has ignited a conversation about the intersection of personal convictions and professional engagements within Hollywood. The incident sheds light on the evolving landscape of an industry where actors, driven by their principles, are making public declarations that resonate with their beliefs.


As the entertainment industry continues to navigate these complexities, the clash between Caviezel and De Niro serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between personal ethics and the collaborative spirit that defines filmmaking.